Skip to content

Master Teacher Initiative

« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 29, 2007

"Stop it! You're Killing Me!": Retooling Your Lecture

By Peter Connor

How many times have you stood at the front of a lecture hall half way through a critical presentation only to be greeted by the silent scream: Stop it! You're killing me!

Every teacher who's ever been there knows the lecture hall is a tough room. So how do the masters connect with their students? How do they keep their students heads from doing the nod and snap as they barely remain conscious? How do they keep them interested and engaged for 50 minutes?

Although many articles have been written on the subject, one of the best is How About a Quick One? by North Carolina State University chemical engineering professor Richard M. Felder.

In it Felder observes: "Of all instructional methods, lecturing is the most common, the easiest, and the least effective." Hardly an encouraging statement, but he goes on to describe some simple ways for retooling dull lecture practices with more interesting and active instructional methods.

Some that have proven both effective and efficient include:

* In-class Group Problem-Building
* In-class Group Problem-Solving
* In-class Group Trouble-Shooting
* In-class Group Brainstorming
* In-class Reflection and Question Generating

One or two of these, taking roughly five minutes each, strategically breaks up a lecture period, stimulates class participation, engages student attention and elevates interest in the subject at hand, all of which maximizes the teaching moment.

The only time you really want hear the "Stop it! You're killing me" line is in somebody else's comedy routine. Boring is as boring does. If you're bored with the lecture you've prepared, what of your students?

You don't have to be a spellbinder to be a good teacher but, as Felder observes, there are definitely "better ways" of presenting lectures and, in doing so, becoming a better teacher.

To learn more about implementing active instructional methods in your classroom lectures, read Felder's complete article - online at: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Columns/
Quickone.html

Source: Felder, R. M. (1992, Winter). How about a quick one? Chemical Engineering Education, 26 (1), 18-19. Retrieved June 17, 2007, from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Columns/
Quickone.html

October 22, 2007

EDUCAUSE's Top-Ten Teaching and Learning Issues, 2007

This week's tip comes from EDUCAUSE. The "EDUCAUSE Quarterly" recently published a list of the "Top-Ten Teaching and Learning Issues, 2007" (online at http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0732.pdf).

The 10 issues they identify are:

1. Establishing and supporting a culture of evidence
2. Demonstrating improvement of learning
3. Translating learning research into practice
4. Selecting appropriate models and strategies for e-learning
5. Providing tools to meet growing student expectations
6. Providing professional development and support to new audiences
7. Sharing content, applications, and application development
8. Protecting institutional data
9. Addressing emerging ethical challenges
10. Understanding the evolving role of academic technologists.

For a thorough explanation of these issues, see the full article online at http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0732.pdf.

October 16, 2007

Crafting a Teaching Persona

In preparation for our MTI presentation this Thursday by Morris Burns and Billy Thornton on "Teachers as Actors," take a look at TILT's teaching tip on "Crafting a Teaching Persona" and James Lang's "Chronicle of Higher Education" article of the same name.

October 08, 2007

Breathing Life Into the Lecture Hall

This week, here's an interesting article about alternatives to the traditional lecture, as featured in the Washington Post. It specifically mentions iClickers as one alternative method of teaching. A full citation and link to the article online are below the text:

Breathing Life Into the Lecture Hall
By Valerie Strauss, Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, September 24, 2007; B01

Nearly 200 students sat in the large lecture hall, staring down at their professor, Edward F. Redish, holding pencils at the ready to take notes in Fundamentals of Physics. It looked like a traditional lecture course, but appearance is where the tradition ended.

Instead of spending 50 minutes putting students to sleep by lecturing about position, velocity and acceleration, Redish, a University of Maryland professor, kept the students awake by getting them actively involved in the lesson -- all 192 of them.

He called on his students by name, having taken and studied their pictures. He frequently directed students to solve a problem with their neighbors or register opinions with a "clicker" system that, within seconds, calculates the answers and shows him the response. Sometimes he performs an experiment or shows part of a movie. And if he sees someone doing a crossword puzzle, he is liable to walk over and help out.

This is Redish's version of the time-honored college lecture course, which is undergoing significant change at some universities because of technological innovations and the desire to hold the attentions of the highly structured 21st-century student.

"Lecturing is not good for children and other living things," said Redish, who spent 25 years in theoretical nuclear physics and now researches how students learn physics. "They don't really learn very much in a lecture."

Once, all professors spent entire classes talking nearly nonstop while students furiously scribbled notes. Today, a growing number of professors are abandoning that tradition, saying there are better ways to keep students focused and learning.

"Sooner or later, you lose track of what the point is of the lecture. Your mind wanders," said Eric Mazur, a Harvard University physics professor whose book "Peer Instruction" is widely used among educators looking for alternative ways to teach. "For some people, it will happen seven minutes into the lecture; for others, 20 minutes. The problem is that when that happens, you are lost."

Or as Wenimo Okoya, 19, a junior in Redish's course, put it: "It's boring. A lot of students fall asleep."

Gideon Haile, a 20-year-old junior, said the reason he loves Redish's class is because he so "interactive." But, he said, "he's the only one."

Professors who have embraced new techniques frequently have turned to PowerPoint, saying it fits the lifestyle of today's students, who grew up with computers, cellphones and other forms of technology and whose lives have been far more structured than those of past generations.

Devon Welsh, 21, a junior and natural resource management major at U-Md., said it allows teachers to "give you the simplified version of what they are saying."

But some professors say it is making a bad thing worse. Students spend all their time scribbling down what's on the PowerPoint presentation, they say, and that leads professors to structure lessons around the visual presentation rather than creating a lecture with a beginning, middle and end that tells a story and can excite students.

"If the old traditional lecture is dying, it is because we are relying so much on the template of technology to make up for the lack of content," said Michael Bugeja, director of the Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication at Iowa State University. "PowerPoint has done more to kill the lecture than people really are aware of."

Other instructors have turned to the clicker, a device similar to a remote control, which students point at a receiver in the front of a classroom to answer questions. It also allows professors to determine almost instantly what percentage of students have the right answer.

Last week, Redish asked the students to use the clickers to state whether the acceleration in an experiment was positive, negative, zero or impossible to know. Within 10 seconds, he knew that most students had chosen incorrectly.

"Eighty-six percent got the wrong answer," he said. "Physics is about data. Our first intuition is not quite right. We have to modify our intuition."

Students say clickers keep them engaged, if not entertained.

"I feel like I'm in 'ask the audience' on 'Who Wants to be a Millionaire,' " said Landon Katz, 18, a freshman.

Of course, there are still some professors who can galvanize a class by using dramatic storytelling, internal structure, movement and a strong voice.

Seth Jacobs, a Boston College associate professor of history, said he uses skills he learned in his previous life as an actor, sometimes employing voices other than his own to bring historical figures to life. He has never used PowerPoint, but he has won teaching awards.

The problem, some educators say, is that few teachers can bring a lecture to life.

"Far too many lecturers tend to read aloud material students could readily read on their own," said Coleen Grisson, professor of English at Trinity University in San Antonio.

Harvard University education professor Julie Reuben said a poll of college courses would find that many professors still rely on traditional lecturing as a primary mode of instruction. It's what they had during their college years, said Daniel J. Klionsky, a biology professor at the University of Michigan who has written about the lecture as a teaching tool. And some say the vast class sizes necessitate the format.

However, another dynamic exists, Reuben said. Professors often spend their adult lives researching a particular topic and feel they have a unique synthesis and understanding of the research. They want to talk about their work.

And although the process of putting together the lectures is a creative, intense experience for professors, it doesn't always translate to students who have to sit and listen, Reuben said.

"This is one of the tensions," she said. "How do you have courses in which students have a similar kind of intensive learning?"

-----------------------------
Full citation:
Strauss, Valerie. "Breathing Life Into the Lecture Hall." The Washington Post, 9/24/07; B01; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2007/09/23/ST2007092301180.html?sid=ST2007092301180

October 02, 2007

Teaching with Humor

By Peter Connor

Public speakers often begin a speech with a joke or an amusing anecdote, and for good reason: to get everyone's attention, to calm the babble of conversations going on in a room full of people. Giving everyone a good laugh at the beginning brings an audience together. It bonds everyone—if only for a moment—the glue being the punch line, the point of the story, the thing everyone gets.

In the classroom, humor can go a long way toward creating an atmosphere that fosters learning. It can relieve tension, break the ice, and open the floor to a discussion in which students are relaxed enough to fully participate and contribute. As a pedagogical tool, it can help reduce student-anxiety, increase retention of lecture-specific information, and diffuse awkward classroom situations.


Humor can also misfire. It's funny that way. The joke you think is funny, others may not. In an academic setting, care must be taken to place jokes and anecdotes in the context of the material being presented and in a manner that supports the lesson being taught. To be effective in the classroom, humor must be constructive.

Ted Powers, professor of psychology at Parkland College, Champaign, IL, in a thoughtful article, Engaging Students with Humor, in The Observer, a publication of the APS (Association for Psychological Science), has some useful guidelines for incorporating humor into your teaching style and classroom routine (Dec. 2005). His overarching message: be careful, as much as it is useful, humor is a delicate thing. The areas of humor Powers discusses include:

Hurtful humor: Avoiding being hostile or demeaning of others

Subject, tone and intent: More about hurtful humor

Situational student/teacher dynamics: Judging the joke climate

Afraid to be funny? Losing your fear of embarrassment

Making humor relevant: Deliver timely, content-oriented humor

Illustrating concepts and content by "Acting it Out"

Using funny movie and TV clips to make a point

Dancing with cell phones: Managing classroom disruptions

Using humor in test and quiz questions: Do you dare?

Using funny life stories, both yours and your students

Powers recommends humor be "used in moderation….You want to teach well, not do a stand-up comic routine." For maximum effect, it should be employed deliberately, and as a general rule, be well thought out.

Citation: Powers, T. (2005, December). Engaging Students with Humor. The Observer, 18(12). Retrieved August 16, 2007, from http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1904